When a project stalls for no apparent reason

When a project stalls for no apparent reason, the first step is to make sure there really is no reason. Your lawyer, architect or adviser reviews the file, the status of each application and the contracts already signed, because many hold-ups have a written cause that only someone who reads such files every day will spot. If that review confirms everything is in order and the project still will not move, look at the full timeline, with the project’s dates alongside those of your own life: when things began to slow, what changed at that moment and which decision has been waiting ever since. At that point, and alongside those professionals, a private consultation can offer a different view of the situation of the person carrying the project, while the file stays with those who handle it.

In this article

1. When does a delay become a standstill?
2. What do your lawyer, architect and advisers check first?
3. When everything is in order and nothing moves
4. How do you read the timeline of a project that will not move?
5. Is this still your project?
6. A different kind of view, once the file has nothing more to say
7. How long should you wait before rethinking a project?
8. Frequently asked questions

When does a delay become a standstill?

Every project of any size runs late. Planning permission takes longer than expected, the bank asks for one more document, the signing is put back because the valuation is still outstanding. That is part of running a business, and anyone who has done it for long enough builds in a margin.

A standstill is something else. You recognise it not by the extra weeks but by the shape the waiting takes. The project does not move slowly; it moves forward and then back, or circles the same stage without ever leaving it. It tends to appear in three forms that recur with little variation.

The first is the permit that never arrives. The application for planning permission or a building permit has been lodged, the drawings were complete, every request for further information was answered, and still no decision comes. Each call to the local authority is met courteously and without a date. Meanwhile the site sits idle, the financing costs keep running and every other date in the schedule slips as well.

The second is the transaction that slips back at every stage. The purchase of a business, a new investor coming in, the sale of a property: everything seems agreed, and just before each next step something surfaces that sends it back. A missing document, a clause that gets reread, a figure that needs checking again. None of these loops is serious in itself; what wears you down is that the deal never gets past the stage it is at.

The third is the investment that will not start although everything is ready. The funding is approved, the permits granted, the team in place, and yet building does not begin, the opening is postponed or the final signature keeps receding, without anyone being able to say exactly why. It is the most bewildering of the three, because nothing on paper shows where to look.

What they share is a very specific feeling: pushing something that does not move when every indicator says it should. That feeling proves nothing. It still deserves to be taken seriously, starting with the most prosaic checks.

What do your lawyer, architect and advisers check first?

Before you look for an explanation anywhere else, the project needs to pass through the hands of people who can read its paperwork. That holds even when you are convinced everything is fine: whoever delegates the most is often the one who knows their own file the least. The review usually covers three areas.

The file

This means everything that has been submitted and everything that has been received. An administrative procedure can hang on something very small: a document assumed to have been filed that is not on record, a report from another public body that nobody requested, a request for further information sitting in an online account that nobody checks. Your architect or planning consultant can find out the actual status and tell you, in writing, what is missing and where it is held.

The applications

A project rarely depends on a single procedure. An operating licence may wait on planning permission, the loan on a valuation, and the valuation in turn on the permission. When procedures are chained together, one stalled link is enough to make the whole thing look blocked. Ask for that chain to be drawn on a single sheet: what depends on what, and where each link stands today.

The contracts

In private transactions, the obstacle is often written into the contract itself, sometimes in a clause signed long ago and forgotten since. A condition precedent that has not yet been met, a financing condition, a deadline that passed unnoticed, a consent that one side still needs from its shareholders or from a regulator. Your lawyer will tell you what the documents provide for, how much room they leave and what you would do well to avoid in the meantime.

Bring everything you have to those meetings, even what seems beside the point: emails, letters, drafts, dated notes of calls. And ask each professional the same question, which is more useful than it sounds: what exactly is missing, and who has to move it? If the answer is clear, the standstill has a name. If nobody can answer, that is information too. Why this work comes before any other, ours included, is the subject of our note Where the lawyer ends.

When everything is in order and nothing moves

Sometimes the review does find something. The standstill then stops being a mystery and becomes a task: a document to provide, a clause to renegotiate, a procedure to start. That is the best news available in the circumstances, even if it does not feel like it at first. At other times the review ends with a sentence more unsettling than any fault: everything is correct.

It is a peculiar moment. You have done everything you were supposed to do, asked everyone you were supposed to ask, and the answer is that there is no answer. The file is complete, the contracts hide nothing, the deadlines have been met. And the project is exactly where it was.

What people go through then is rarely talked about. There is the tiredness of carrying something that does not advance and yet takes up part of every week. There is doubt about your own judgement: whether the project was a good idea, whether the timing was right, whether you are missing something obvious. And there is a feeling that is harder to name, that the matter can no longer be explained by paperwork alone.

Three temptations appear at this point, all of them understandable. The first is to force the pace: replace every adviser at once, accept worse terms just to see something move, sign what you would never have signed before. The second is to look for an explanation at any price and adopt the first one that seems to fit. The third is to give up quietly, to stop calling and stop asking, without ever having decided anything. None of the three is a decision; all three are ways of escaping discomfort.

If you feel the urge to force things, it is worth asking where that pressure comes from, which is the question behind our note Haste is a signal. There is a slower alternative: to stop looking at the file and start looking at time. What the documents cannot explain, the timeline sometimes suggests.

How do you read the timeline of a project that will not move?

A timeline is not a summary of the project. It is a list of dates, as precise as possible, that shows at a glance what months of emails and meetings conceal. It can be put together in an afternoon, with your diary, your inbox and the file open in front of you, and it requires no technical knowledge.

1. Note the date the idea was born and the date you decided to go ahead, which are not always the same.
2. Note every formal step: applications, signatures, requests for information, replies, decisive meetings.
3. Mark the moment you first sensed that something was slowing down, even if you would not have put it that way at the time.
4. Alongside, in a separate column, write down what was happening on those same dates in your company and in your life.
5. Highlight the delays that depended on you: documents you were slow to send, calls you put off, signatures you left for later.

Hardly anyone takes the fourth step, and it is often the most revealing. No project is carried out in a vacuum. If the slowdown began the same spring that you were settling an estate, selling another company, going through a change in your private life or taking on a new responsibility, the coincidence proves nothing. But it belongs on the same page.

The fifth step asks for honesty, which is why it gets skipped. People describing a stalled project usually tell it as something that is happening to them. The timeline sometimes shows otherwise: that certain stages were also waiting on a decision of their own, on a document that never quite got sent, on a call that slid into the following week. This is not about blame. It is about seeing precisely where each pause occurred.

Then look at the whole page. If the project always stops at the same stage, that stage deserves a question of its own. If the slowdown began before any problem appeared in the paperwork, read the other column as well, without jumping to conclusions. And if this is not the first project to come to a halt at the same point, with different people and in different circumstances, the question changes scale; that is what we discuss in the note When a pattern repeats.

Is this still your project?

The question may sound odd when you have spent months pushing something forward. But projects change while they wait, and so do the people carrying them. This one was conceived at a particular moment, with a drive, plans and sometimes companions that are no longer the same. What was obvious then may have quietly stopped being so without anyone saying it aloud, you included.

Some projects carry more than their own logic. The new warehouse that was meant to prove the second generation could grow the business too; the hotel that was to crown a career; the investment intended to leave something for the children. When a project bears that weight, a standstill is not experienced as a scheduling problem but as something more personal, and the decisions around it become harder to take calmly.

It helps to separate two sentences that sound almost identical: “the project isn’t moving forward” and “I’m no longer moving forward with it”. The first describes a file; the second describes a person. Some people find, while writing their timeline, that the slowdown began at roughly the moment they stopped being sure they wanted to carry on. That is not a reproach. It is information no review of documents can give you.

A small exercise, ideally on paper, makes this concrete. Imagine the permit arrived tomorrow and notice whether you feel relief or a fresh burden. Then imagine the project did not yet exist and someone put it to you today, and ask yourself whether you would take it on under the same conditions. Finally, write down what you would lose by letting it go, apart from the money already spent. The answers do not decide anything for you, but they bring order to what is at stake. Our note Three questions before deciding offers another angle on the same kind of reflection.

A different kind of view, once the file has nothing more to say

At this stage some people feel that what remains open no longer falls within their advisers’ remit. Those advisers have done their part: their field is the file, and what weighs now no longer lies in the file alone. This is when some look for a view of another kind, one that does not reread the documents but considers the whole situation, the person included.

That is the ground on which we work. Tony Alcalá has worked in this field since 1978; he was trained in Germany and holds consultations in English, German and Spanish. Patty García brings a sensitive perception of situations and works in Spanish. What such a consultation looks at is your situation as a whole: the project, the timeline you have prepared, the period of your life in which the slowdown began and the decision in front of you. We explain how we work directly, in conversation, before you decide anything.

Timing matters. As long as the file has not been reviewed, the conversation you need is with your lawyer, architect or adviser, and that is exactly what we will tell you if you write to us before then. The same applies if a legal deadline is about to expire: that deadline belongs to your lawyer and deserves their full attention. A private consultation makes sense afterwards, in parallel: the professionals carry on with their work, and you have a separate space in which to look at what they do not deal with.

The first step is a conversation, by WhatsApp or by telephone, with one of the two of us. We listen, weigh up whether we have anything to contribute in your case and give you a clear yes or no, with the reason. If the answer is yes, you will know before anything begins what the work covers, how long it lasts and what it costs, and that amount does not change afterwards. Our frequently asked questions set out what happens before we accept a case and how the work is invoiced.

How long should you wait before rethinking a project?

There is no general rule, and anyone who offers you one without knowing your situation deserves a measure of scepticism. There is, however, a difference between waiting and simply staying stuck. The first is a decision with a date; the second is a state of affairs that drags on because no one has brought it to a close.

A simple way to move from being stuck to waiting by choice is to set yourself a review date. Not a deadline by which the project must have moved, since that is not in your hands, but a day on which you will sit down with the timeline, your advisers and your own answers, and decide. Until then the project runs its course without your having to ask yourself every morning whether it continues.

When that day comes, there are usually four options, and all of them are legitimate. Carry on as things are, knowing why. Wait again, with a new date and a specific reason. Reshape the project: scale it down, change the site, the financing partner or the timetable. Or let it go, which is also a decision, and often the hardest. What each option costs in money, tax and contractual obligations is for your lawyer and tax adviser to calculate; what it costs you in time and peace of mind is yours to weigh.

In the meantime, two things protect your room for manoeuvre. The first is discretion: a stalled project that everyone talks about weighs twice as much, because every conversation forces you to explain what you do not yet know, and because your bank, your partners and the market draw their own conclusions. The second is to sign nothing important on your most tired days. A decision taken mainly to escape discomfort answers to tiredness, not to the project.

Frequently asked questions

What can I do if my planning permission is taking too long?

Ask your architect, planning consultant or lawyer to check the exact status of the application with the local authority and to tell you in writing what is missing, whether any request for information is still unanswered and at which stage the process has stopped. Check too that no official correspondence is sitting unread in an online account. What options exist when an authority is slow to decide depends on the country and the procedure, and it is for your lawyer to assess them before you act on your own.

Why does a business sale keep getting delayed?

Often because something in writing makes it so: a condition precedent that has not yet been met, a financing condition, an outstanding consent or a document one side does not have. Your lawyer can find it by reading the full set of agreements. If that reading turns up nothing and the deal still slips back at every stage, draw up a timeline with exact dates: it shows whether the delays always occur at the same point, and since when.

How long should you wait before abandoning a project?

There is no period that applies to everyone; it depends on what the project costs to keep going and what it means to you. The practical approach is to set a review date and, with the timeline and your advisers’ views in front of you, choose on that day between continuing, waiting again for a specific reason, reshaping the project and letting it go. What each option means financially, fiscally and contractually is for your lawyer and tax adviser to work out.

How do I know if a stalled project is still worth pursuing?

By separating two questions that tend to get mixed up: whether the project still stands up on paper, which your advisers can examine with you, and whether you still want it, which only you can answer. A useful exercise is to imagine the permit or the signature arriving tomorrow and to notice whether you feel relief or a new burden. If the burden wins, the question may no longer be the standstill itself.

Who can I talk to when everything is in order and the project is still stuck?

First, to the same professionals, to confirm in writing that “in order” means the same thing to all of them and that nothing is outstanding. Then to someone outside both the project and your usual circle, because inside a company every conversation has consequences. Alongside your advisers, a private consultation may then make sense, looking at your situation as a whole. Setting out your situation costs nothing: we listen and tell you yes or no, with the reason.

← All notes